Three jurisdictions are enforcing AI regulation this year, with fines up to 7% of global revenue. ComplyOn classifies your systems, maps your obligations, and generates the documentation — in hours, not months.
It usually starts the same way. An enterprise prospect sends over a vendor questionnaire with a section on AI regulation. You open it, realize you can’t answer most of the questions, and forward it to legal. Legal quotes six figures and six months. You Google it yourself and land in 113 articles of EU regulation, a Colorado bill nobody on your team has read, and a California rulemaking that’s still evolving.
You don’t actually need a compliance program right now. You need to answer the questionnaire, close the deal, and figure out the rest later. But “figure out the rest later” doesn’t work when three jurisdictions are enforcing simultaneously and the fines are 7% of global revenue.
ComplyOn does the thing you need done: classifies your AI system under each jurisdiction, tells you exactly what documents you need, and generates them. One afternoon. Your lawyer reviews a 90% draft instead of building from scratch.
3
jurisdictions covered
19
document types generated
~4h
from intake to audit-ready docs
90%
complete drafts for legal review
The problem
“I received my first compliance inquiry from a potential European client. They provided a comprehensive questionnaire. Unfortunately, I found myself unable to confidently address most of their questions.”
SaaS founder, r/SaaS — March 2026
Discovered EU AI Act obligations when a prospect sent a questionnaire
“We ended up investing $47K in tools, consultants, and audit fees, which consumed six months of our runway. Ultimately, we didn't survive.”
Former startup founder, r/SaaS — April 2026
Company destroyed by compliance costs
“Nobody warned me the EU AI Act had teeth. Then I got a $40K quote from a compliance lawyer.”
SaaS builder, r/buildinpublic — February 2026
Discovered fine-tuning OpenAI models = provider obligations
“Clients are asking "Are you compliant with the EU AI Act?" before they consider renewing contracts. Many agencies lack the documentation.”
AI agency founder, r/aiagents — March 2026
Losing contract renewals for lack of compliance docs
Big 4 compliance program
$200K+
3-6 months. PwC, Deloitte, EY, KPMG. For companies with 1,000+ employees.
Outside counsel
$50K–$150K
$500-$800/hr. Most AI regulation specialists are booked 3-6 months out.
ComplyOn
$499–$3K/mo
Same documentation types. Hours, not months. Your lawyer reviews a draft, not a blank page.
How it works
~15 min per system
Answer 24 structured questions about your AI system — what it does, who it affects, where it operates. Our engine determines your exact risk tier under each jurisdiction, citing the specific regulatory article behind every determination.
No guessing, no generic “you might be high-risk.” Click through the examples below to see how classification works across different AI systems and industries.
EU AI Act
Annex III, Area 4(a) — Employment
Colorado SB 24-205
§ 6-1-1702 — Employment decisions
California ADMT
CCPA § 1798.185(a)(16) — Employment
15
total docs
9
unique needed
6 documents overlap across jurisdictions
Write once, satisfy multiple regulations
Automatic after classification
60-70% of compliance work overlaps between EU, Colorado, and California. We identify that overlap so you document once, satisfy multiple jurisdictions. Your resume screener needs 15 documents total — but 6 of those satisfy requirements in all three jurisdictions simultaneously.
One click per document
19 document types, each generated from your specific system data and classification results. Not templates with blanks — complete drafts that address your system, your data, your risk tier, with the correct regulatory citations.
Your lawyer reviews a 90% complete document instead of starting from scratch. That's the difference between a $5K legal review and a $50K legal project.
Annex IV Technical Documentation
Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment
Deployer Impact Assessment
Pre-Decision Consumer Notice
ADMT Risk Assessment
Pre-Use ADMT Notice
+ 13 more document types across all jurisdictions
Deadline tracker
days until enforcement
Colorado AI Act
Jun 30, 2026
days until enforcement
EU AI Act
Aug 2, 2026
days until enforcement
California ADMT
Jan 1, 2027
Built for
You're the GC, VP Legal, or Head of Product who just got handed “figure out AI compliance” alongside everything else you already do.
50-500 employees. AI features in production. EU customers. Too big to ignore the regulation, too small for a $200K compliance program. This is your sweet spot.
Built on AI from day one. Your next enterprise prospect will ask about AI Act compliance before they sign. Your next investor will ask about regulatory risk in due diligence.
You know you need Annex IV docs and impact assessments but your outside counsel is quoting $50K+ and 4 months. Start with a 90% draft your firm can review in days, not months.
Pricing
Free assessment for everyone. Cancel anytime.
Starter
1 AI system, 1 jurisdiction
Professional
Up to 3 systems, all jurisdictions
Business
Up to 10 systems, advisory included
Enterprise
Unlimited systems, dedicated advisor
Law firm assessment
$10K–$30K
Just to tell you what you need
Outside counsel
$50K–$150K
3–6 months, specialists booked out
Big 4 program
$200K+
For 1,000+ employee companies
FAQ
No. ComplyOn generates compliance documentation based on published regulatory text (EU Regulation 2024/1689, Colorado SB 24-205, California CCPA ADMT) and your system data. Every document includes a disclaimer. We recommend legal review before regulatory submission — but you'll hand your lawyer a 90% complete draft instead of a blank page.
Vanta added an EU AI Act module in late 2024, but it's a checkbox tracker — it doesn't understand what Article 9 requires for your specific system. OneTrust covers EU AI Act but starts at $50K+/year and an independent review found zero Colorado SB 24-205 workflows. Neither covers California ADMT. We're purpose-built for multi-jurisdiction AI regulation at 10-20% the cost.
That's the first thing our classification engine determines. Answer structured questions about what your system does, who it affects, and where it operates. We cite the specific article (Annex III, Article 6, SB 24-205 § 6-1-1702) behind every determination. If it's ambiguous, we flag it as an edge case rather than guessing.
Yes. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 cover security controls, not AI-specific regulatory obligations. The EU AI Act requires separate documentation: Annex IV technical docs, fundamental rights impact assessments, conformity declarations, transparency notices. Colorado requires deployer-specific impact assessments. None of that is generated by your existing compliance platform.
We're tracking the March 2026 draft bill proposing to replace SB 24-205 with a narrower ADMT framework. If that passes, we update our Colorado module to match the new requirements — which would actually align more closely with California's ADMT model, making the cross-jurisdiction value even stronger. Your documentation adapts with the regulation.
EU AI Act (Regulation EU 2024/1689 — including Annex III high-risk classification, GPAI obligations, and Article 50 transparency), Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205), and California CCPA ADMT Regulations. We're the only self-serve platform under $2,000/month that covers all three.
Every enterprise deal, every investor call, every procurement questionnaire — they're all going to ask the same thing: “Are you compliant?” The companies with documentation close the deal. The rest get disqualified.
Take the Free AssessmentFree · No account · See your risk tier in 2 minutes